Future Ethereum: Scripture cleaning for Mimblewimble
In recent years, the Ethereum community has exceeded the limits of scalability, security and user -friendliness. An important aspect that caused a discussion is how to treat scripts in transactions without impairing performance or compatibility with Mimblewimble (MWB) for MBW the compatibility compatibility between the scripts and the use of the MBW in the main chain and potential solutions that Enable Bitcoin both MBW and other functions can adapt.
Why the scripting cleaning is required
The cleaning script is a procedure that removes unnecessary or unnecessary code (or “script”) from the Ethereum transaction. This is with a combination of techniques such as:
* Scripte compression : Optimization of a script with different algorithms such as LLL (least significant loss) to reduce memory requirements.
!
Clean scripts for Mimblewimble
MWB introduces a new concept entitled “Optimized Script Treaties”, in which the architecture of MBW is used based on script. To support MBW, Ethereum developers must ensure that the basic blockchain script system can submit these optimized contracts without endangering or compatibility. The cleaning script is required in this scenario, since:
* Scriptoptimization : Optimization of a script for MBW requires considerable computer resources and storage space.
* Compatibility of : Without the script, it can lead to inconsistencies between Ethereum and MBW transactions, which leads to problems during validation.
Problems with the compatibility between scripts and MBW
The problem of compatibility is based on the fact that the MBW screenwriter system is designed in such a way that they work within the limit of Ethereum blockchain. This means that the scripts written for EB (ETHEREUM blockchain) may not be compatible with MBW or vice versa without significant modifications.
Adaptation of Bitcoin to enable mimblewimble and functions such as multi-gray, nuclear replacement **
Bitcoin was criticized for limited support for script functions such as multi-gray transactions and nuclear replacement. Various potential solutions were proposed to solve these problems:
* Implementation based on script : Development of a script that can be used on Bitcoin blockchain without endangering performance or compatibility with MBW.
* Interoperability protocols : Creating a protocol that enables perfect communication between Ethereum (or other blockchain) and Bitcoin systems.
* custom block architecture : Design individual blocks, with which certain scripting requirements such as multi-gray transactions can be met.
Although these solutions promise, there are considerable challenges. A more practical approach can include:
* Integration into the existing infrastructure : Construction at the top in the existing blockchain and articles of bag infrastructure to enable MBW-like functions.
* Hybrid solutions
: Development of a system that is unnoticed between different blockchains, e.g. B. the use of the central government or the third party services.
The future of scalability, security and user -friendliness should include constant innovations in optimizing scripts, compatibility solutions and hybrid approaches. By understanding the challenges and opportunities that MBW and other blockchain functions offer, developers can work on creating more robust and user systems for different applications.
